Discriminative potential of exhaled breath condensate biomarkers with respect to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

BACKGROUND: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) affecting 334 million people in the world remains a major cause of morbidity and mortality. Proper diagnosis of COPD is still a challenge and largely solely based on spirometric criteria. We aimed to investigate the potential of nitrosative/oxidative stress and related metabolic biomarkers in exhaled breath condensate (EBC) to discriminate COPD patients. METHODS: Three hundred three participants were randomly selected from a 15,000-transit worker cohort within the Respiratory disease Occupational Biomonitoring Collaborative Project (ROBoCoP). COPD was defined using the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) criteria as post-bronchodilator ratio of Forced Expiratory Volume in 1st second to Forced Vital Capacity < 0.7 in spirometry validated by an experienced pulmonologist. Discriminative power of biomarker profiles in EBC was analyzed using linear discriminant analyses. RESULTS: Amongst 300 participants with validated spirometry, 50.3% were female, 52.3 years old in average, 36.0% were current smokers, 12.7% ex-smokers with mean tobacco exposure of 15.4 pack-years. Twenty-one participants (7.0%) were diagnosed as COPD, including 19 new diagnoses, 12 of which with a mild COPD stage (GOLD 1). Amongst 8 biomarkers measured in EBC, combination of 2 biomarkers, Lactate and Malondialdehyde (MDA) significantly discriminated COPD subjects from non-COPD, with a 71%-accuracy, area under the receiver curve of 0.78 (p-value < 0.001), and a negative predictive value of 96%. CONCLUSIONS: These findings support the potential of biomarkers in EBC, in particular lactate and MDA, to discriminate COPD patients even at a mild or moderate stage. These EBC biomarkers present a non-invasive and drugless technique, which can improve COPD diagnosis in the future.

Long-term exposure to PM10 and respiratory health among Parisian subway workers.

Exposure to ambient PM10 may increase the risk of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and lung function decline. We evaluated the long-term exposure to PM10 and its relationship with COPD prevalence and lung function in Parisian subway workers. Participants were randomly selected from a 15,000-subway worker cohort. Individual annual external exposure to PM10 (ePM10) was estimated using a company-specific job-exposure-matrix based on PM10 measurements conducted between 2004 and 2019 in the Parisian subway network. Mean annual inhaled PM10 exposure (iPM10) was modeled as function of ePM10 exposure, inhalation rate, and filtration efficiency of the respiratory protection used. COPD diagnosis was performed in March-May 2021 based on post-bronchodilator spirometry. The relationship between iPM10 and outcomes was assessed using logistic and linear regression models, adjusted for exposure duration and potential confounders. Amongst 254 participants with complete data, 17 were diagnosed as COPD. The mean employment duration was 23.2 ± 7.3years, with annual mean ePM10 of 71.8 ± 33.7 µg/m3 and iPM10 of 0.59 ± 0.27 µg/shift, respectively. A positive but statistically non-significant association was found for COPD prevalence with iPM10 (OR = 1.034, 95%-CI = 0.781; 1.369, per 100 ng/shift) and ePM10 (OR = 1.029, 95%-CI = 0.879; 1.207, per 10 µg/m3). No decline in lung function was associated with PM10 exposure. However, forced expiratory volume during the first second and forced vital capacity lower than normal were positively associated with exposure duration (OR = 1.125, 95%-CI = 1.004; 1.260 and OR = 1.171, 95%-CI = 0.989; 1.386 per year, respectively). Current smoking was strongly associated with COPD prevalence (OR = 6.85, 95%-CI = 1.87; 25.10) and most lung function parameters. This is the first study assessing the relationship between long-term exposure to subway PM10 and respiratory health in subway workers. The risk estimates related with subway PM10 exposure are compatible with those related to outdoor PM10 exposure in the large recent studies. Large cohorts of subway workers are necessary to confirm these findings.

Job Exposure Matrix, a Solution for Retrospective Assessment of Particle Exposure in a Subway Network and Their Long-Term Effects.

INTRODUCTION: Health effects after long-term exposure to subway particulate matter (PM) remain unknown due to the lack of individual PM exposure data. This study aimed to apply the job exposure matrix (JEM) approach to retrospectively assess occupational exposure to PM in the Parisian subway. METHODS: Job, the line and sector of the transport network, as well as calendar period were four JEM dimensions. For each combination of these dimensions, we generated statistical models to estimate the annual average PM10 concentration using data from an exhaustive inventory of the PM measurement campaigns conducted between 2004 and 2020 in the Parisian subway and historical data from the Parisian air pollution monitoring network. The resulting JEM and its exposure estimates were critically examined by experts using the uncertainty analysis framework. RESULTS: The resulting JEM allows for the assignment of the estimated annual PM10 concentration to three types of professionals working in the subway: locomotive operators, station agents, and security guards. The estimates' precision and validity depend on the amount and quality of PM10 measurement data used in the job-, line-, and sector-specific models. Models using large amounts of personal exposure measurement data produced rather robust exposure estimates compared to models with lacunary data (i.e., in security guards). The analysis of uncertainty around the exposure estimates allows for the identification of the sources of uncertainty and parameters to be addressed in the future in order to refine and/or improve the JEM. CONCLUSIONS: The JEM approach seems relevant for the retrospective exposure assessment of subway workers. When applied to available data on PM10, it allows for the estimation of this exposure in locomotive operators and station agents with an acceptable validity. Conversely, for security guards, the current estimates have insufficient validity to recommend their use in an epidemiological study. Therefore, the current JEM should be considered as a valid prototype, which shall be further improved using more robust measurements for some jobs. This JEM can also be further refined by considering additional exposure determinants.

A comparative study of edetate calcium disodium and dimercaptosuccinic acid in the treatment of lead poisoning in adults.

BACKGROUND: We evaluated the efficacy of two antidotes, edetate calcium disodium (CaNa2EDTA) and dimercaptosuccinic acid (DMSA), for the treatment of lead poisoning in adults. METHODS: Thirty-seven patients with blood lead concentrations >40 µg/dL and positive CaNa2EDTA lead mobilization were randomized to receive 1050 mg/m2/day of oral DMSA (n = 21) or 500 mg/m2/day of intravenous CaNa2EDTA (n = 16) over two five-day courses separated by a 10-day rest period. Efficacy of treatment was evaluated by blood lead assays on the first day of the two courses and 14 days after the end of treatment and baseline CaNa2EDTA lead mobilization test and 14 days after the end of treatment. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: Both treatments significantly reduced the prevalence of clinical symptoms, blood lead levels and CaNa2EDTA lead mobilization and were well tolerated. DMSA had a greater impact on reducing blood lead concentrations (p = .005) and CaNa2EDTA on lead mobilization (p = .04). Comparison of equimolar doses showed that CaNa2EDTA was more effective than DMSA (p < .001).